Why InterFields beat binary contact

Continuous InterField beats binary touch — +90% Contact F1 in the generative setting.

Fitting task render-and-compare
optimisation

Generative task joint estimation
from scratch

Task	Representation	$\mathrm{CD}_{\mathrm{obj}}$ ↓	Contact F1 ↑
Fitting	Binary Contact	35.4	17.8
	InterField (ours)	34.6	19.8 +11%

Generative	Binary Contact	49.11	0.152
	InterField (ours)	41.01	0.290 +90%

Ours +90% Contact F1
over binary touch